Manifesto. noun, a public declaration of intentions, opinions, objectives, or motives…
Lecture. noun, (1.) An exposition of a given subject delivered before an audience or a class, as for the purpose of instruction. (2.) An earnest admonition or reproof; a reprimand.
There’s much ado by arm-chair critics media consumers regarding Maura Kelly’s Slow Book Manifesto in today’s The Atlantic. Why? Mostly because some were offended by this quote, “Read books. As often as you can. Mostly classics.” And more than a few have commented that Kelly’s intent is to lecture the public on what they should be reading. And that her “Manifesto” is actually an ivory-tower lecture. They then go on to call her names, but mostly settle on calling her a “snob.”
The critics consumers didn’t read her post, nor grasped her point (nor do they - as I would have - attempt to dismantle her supporting evidence).
Kelly argues that she should read more fiction. Not just classics, per se. Why? First, because it’s cognitively beneficial. The brain needs nutrition in order to function well. Second, because fiction contextualizes culture. Without fiction, a nation has no history, no culture, no options for good mental health. And third, because media, such as TV, are not making people happy. Books are one way that reliably makes people happier, and have better lives.
She doesn’t try to jamb classics down anyone’s throats. Not even close. If sci-fi is your thing, read more of it! Harry Potter? Go for it, man.
Her point is to read more books and get away from ‘byte-sized’ media. And her so-called critics media consumers could learn a lesson in that…
</rant>