Posts tagged recycling.

Death rate per watts, Nuclear, Oil, Coal. Classic chart exposes cognitive dissonance, and persistent self-denial…

Do you have an opinion about nuclear power? About the relative safety of one form of power over another? How did you come to this opinion?

Here are the stats. For every person killed by nuclear power generation, 4,000 die due to coal, adjusted for the same amount of power produced.

Vivid is not the same as true. It’s far easier to amplify sudden and horrible outcomes than it is to talk about the slow, grinding reality of day to day strife. That’s just human nature. Not included in this chart are deaths due to global political instability involving oil fields, deaths from coastal flooding and deaths due to environmental impacts yet unmeasured, all of which skew it even more if you think about it.

This chart unsettles a lot of people, because there must be something wrong with it. Further proof of how easy it is to fear the unknown and accept what we’ve got.

Via Seth Godin

Update: Nuclear waste is not an issue.

Update II: The reblog comments are incredible. Not one acknowledged or seems to have read the post. Nor, it seems, has a single reader clicked through to read the original post. Only one commenter, that I could tell, attempted to discuss the underlying facts. Instead, there were mostly “But” type replies that repeat the very myths this chart aims to debunk. What an incredible experience from my point of view, and a major lesson learned…

  02/01/13 at 10:00am

Why Don't Americans Recycle? ›

“Because it doesn’t make a difference” strangely absent.

visualoop:

Via

  04/05/12 at 09:19am via visualoop

Preachy and clever. Still, blaming the consumer for shitty industrial regulations is terrible political message by any government.

sexyactionplanet:

Love this. Was in the cinema with the boyfriend for The Hunger Games and an Australian government mining commercial (propaganda) comes on. I turn to Rich and say “why do we never have engaging ads like this for the environment?”. Five minutes later - this commercial comes on - and it’s brilliant! Please enjoy!

kottke.org: Possible art for the High Line: a hanging train ›

jkottke:

The group in charge of the High Line in NYC is considering a permanent installation for the park by Jeff Koons. It is called Train.

Koons Train

“We’ve had a crush on the ‘Train’ for a while now,” Mr. Hammond said in a phone interview on Monday. “To me, it looks very industrial and sculptural. The craftsmanship that went into these industrial engines is quite beautiful.”

The sculpture, to be constructed of steel and carbon fiber, would weigh several tons. It would also occasionally spin its wheels, blow a horn and emit steam.

In a statement, Mr. Koons said, “The power and the dynamic of the ‘Train’ represents the ephemeral energy that runs through the city every day.”

(via @sippey)

  03/27/12 at 11:30am via jkottke

The Shipbreakers ›

Now re-re-reading. Oh man, Langewiesche is one of the best writers around.

tetw:

by William Langewiesche

At Alang, in India, on a six-mile stretch of oily, smoky beach, 40,000 men tear apart half of the world’s discarded ships, each one a sump of toxic waste. Environmentalists in the West are outraged. The shipbreakers want to be left alone - and maybe they should be.

  03/26/12 at 11:34am via tetw

Exxon Valdez oil tanker likely headed for scrap heap in India ›

“The ship formerly known as the Exxon Valdez, responsible for one of the worst oil spills in U.S. history, appears destined for the scrap heap in a shipyard along the Indian Gulf of Cambay

The tanker ran aground at Alaska’s Bligh Reef on March 24, 1989, and spewed 11 million gallons of crude oil into the rich fishing waters of Prince William Sound.

The shoreline was coated with petroleum sludge. Towns like Cordova that relied on fishing the sound were devastated. An incalculable amount of damage was done to marine species and the surrounding environment.
 
An Anchorage jury in 1991 called for Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil Corp. to pay $5 billion in punitive damages, thought the U.S Supreme Court later reduced that to $507.5 million. Some litigation related to the spill is still ongoing.

Exxon maintained at the time that it should not be liable for the actions of the supertanker’s skipper, Joseph Hazelwood, when the nearly 1,000-foot vessel ran aground with 53 million gallons of oil in its hold.

According to prosecutors, Hazelwood was drunk, but he denied it and was acquitted of the charge in criminal court.”

Read the rest at KING 5

  03/26/12 at 09:55am

expose-the-light:

The blue planet’s toxic new colours

1. Tissue slurry — Ontario, Canada This man-made lake in Terrace Bay, Ontario, Canada, is more than 500 metres long. It’s an aeration pond, part of the waste-treatment system at a factory that produces pulp for Kimberly-Clark tissues. “The treated water is returned to its source — often a river,” says Fair. Each yellow cone is an “agitator” that aerates and churns the liquid, assisting its breakdown. According to Worldwatch Institute figures, if recycled paper was used instead, 64 per cent less energy would be needed.and churns the liquid, assisting its breakdown. According to Worldwatch Institute figures, if recycled paper was used instead, 64 per cent less energy would be needed.

2. Fertiliser — Louisiana, US This emerald-tinted lake near Geismar, Louisiana, includes gypsum, uranium and radium. These chemicals result from manufacturing phosphorous fertiliser and are dumped into this impoundment to solidify. The world’s supplies of phosphates are dwindling and most are located in the US, China and Morocco. Unlike oil, however, there is no known renewable alternative for making fertiliser. “You think the resource crisis is in oil?” says Fair. “Think again.”

3. Spilled oil — Gulf of Mexico, US Fair captured this shot over the BP Deepwater Horizon spill at the Macondo well in June 2010, when 750m litres of oil leaked into the Gulf. “The stuff that was coming out of that well was all different colours,” says Fair. “We think of crude oil as being black — it’s all kinds of different colours and consistencies.” The bright red is the crude on the surface, reflecting light. The less viscous oil below the surface is purple-brown.

4. Liquid sulphur — Alberta, Canada At Fort McMurray in Alberta, Canada, a blood-red vein of liquid sulphur is pumped on to a bed of solidified yellow sulphur. The element is one of the major by-products of tar-sand upgrading and there is now an abundance of stocks globally. With prices low, producer Syncrude isn’t selling — it’s storing it in giant pyramids. Liquid sulphur, at around 200°C (its melting point is 115°C), is pumped into fenced-off compounds and left to harden.

5. Aluminium sludge — Louisiana, US This slurry pit is where the solid and liquid by-products of aluminium manufacture are separated. The process involves refining bauxite ore, which produces alumina. The waste includes bauxite impurities, heavy metals and sodium hydroxide (one of the chemicals used during processing). Fair estimates that the red-brown sludge has a pH of about 13, “meaning if you touch it, it burns the skin off”.

6. Fertiliser slurry — Louisiana, US This wintry-looking scene is a mix of lead, ammonia, mercury and ethanol — by-products of phosphate fertiliser production. “It’s a giant lake of waste,” says Fair, who shot the image 80km west of New Orleans in 2005. Owned by Mosaic Fertilizers, the plant, called Uncle Sam, has violated the US Clean Water Act nine times. The slurry pit is less than 3km from the banks of the Mississippi.

(via rossexton)

Posted by a great tumblrer: skepttv:

Short film dives into landfill gas

I want to share a short video by documentary filmmaker Gary Hustwit and director Jessica Edwards. The Landfill is a short (three minute) film about the often overlooked business of dealing with the things we no longer want to deal with – you know, things like old tires, uneaten food, and other gross things that I won’t mention here.

{Read full story.}

(via skeptv)

windspeakes asked: What do you think of biodegradables?

Biodegradables are a total scam. People really don’t know what actually goes into a landfill, and businesses package products in a way that takes advantage of that lack of knowledge.

Landfills are about 70% industrial, commercial, and municipal waste. Only about 30% is household waste. Of that 30%, about 12% (less than 1% total) is plastic, and 28% (about 5% of the total) is paper (eg, about 6% of landfills are plastic and paper - don’t let anyone fool you! Most enviro-greeny news articles don’t acknowledge that the majority of waste is industrial/commercial. In fact, even the EPA doesn’t fully acknowledge industrial waste in its reports! So, you’d have to research hard to figure it out. See here.).

Biodegradables make people think they’re putting less waste into landfills. They’re not. Biodegradables displace no trash, they simply replace one type of waste with another. There’s no overall effect on landfills or the environment.

In fact, I’d argue that the environmental impacts of biodegradables are higher than non-recyclable plastics due to inefficiencies in manufacturing and shipping. Research here. See my previous posts on waste here and here.

  01/16/12 at 11:51pm

The gypsum mining process, from Georgia Pacific:

At corporate-owned quarries and mines, gypsum is drilled and blasted from the excavation site. This process involves careful inspections of the excavation site, followed by precision undercutting and topcutting prior to blasting.

The rock is then transported to a crusher. Aside from reducing the gypsum to a manageable size, crushing may include a process that dries the rock to remove any free moisture. At this point, we conduct a select grading of rock (commonly known as land plaster).

The rock undergoes a fine grinding process prior to calcination, where the chemical composition of mined gypsum is transformed into a hemi-hydrate of calcium sulfate, making it suitable for commercial applications.

Depending on the calcination method, the resulting plaster exhibits distinct properties and characteristics that affect its suitability for specific applications.

  01/16/12 at 07:00pm

This is why I own Ford stock... And you should too... ›

  11/17/11 at 12:08pm

Vote for the finalist in the Save Award: Down to the Final Four. ›

Basically, the Save Award is a stop waste campaign and increases recycling in the Federal Government. It takes seconds to vote, which is a good thing.

“President Obama believes the best ideas usually come from the front lines. That’s why in 2009 he launched the SAVE Award (Securing Americans Value and Efficiency), seeking ideas from federal employees to make government more effective and efficient and ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. In just three weeks, OMB received tens of thousands of ideas on how to make government more efficient and effective.

Over the past two years, federal employees have submitted more than 56,000 cost-cutting ideas through the SAVE Award. Dozens of the most promising ideas have been included in the President’s Budget, specifically in the Terminations, Reductions, and Savings volume. Each year OMB narrows the best ideas to a “final four.” The American people vote online to choose the winner. The winner will come to Washington to present their idea to the President.”

Save Award

  11/17/11 at 10:56am

This looks pretty good.

The “smart bins” are equipped with solar panels and batteries which can operate for up to five days once fully charged. Waste is compressed to a fifth of its original size which allows the bin to hold a lot more than its usual capacity. As it utilises space more efficiently, a smart bin need to be emptied less often which reduces the pollution created by garbage trucks that come to collect it. Each bin is equipped with a 3G transmitter which provides sanitation workers with a real time alert when it is full through a smartphone application that also displays its location. (via Korean Startup Aims to Solve Trash Issues)

(via thenextweb)

  11/15/11 at 09:50am via thenextweb.com

USA.gov: What's In Common Household Products? A database for you. ›

Well worth bookmarking this excellent resource that shows the chemicals used in everyday goods. Glad to see the gvt posting this information. I’m sure manufacturers hate it (eg, disclosure is the major flaw of free market systems). There are thousands and thousands of products, everything from glue to motor oil to deodorant.  

Have you ever wondered what chemical ingredients are in some of the common household products that you buy? The Household Products Database can tell you about the product’s ingredients, any possible health concerns and give you tips on proper handling.

The database links several thousand consumer brands to health effects from Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) provided by product manufacturers. The products in the database run the gamut from air fresheners to flea and tick control to mascara. The database lets you research products by chemical ingredients, manufacturer, or health effects, and can help you answer questions such as:

  • What are the chemical ingredients in specific brands?
  • Which products contain specific chemical ingredients?
  • Who manufactures a specific brand? How do I contact this manufacturer?
  • What are the acute and chronic effects of chemical ingredients in a specific brand?
  • What other information is available about chemicals in other National Library of Medicine databases?

Information in the Household Products Database comes from a variety of publicly available sources including brand labels and Material Safety Data Sheets when the MSDS are available from manufacturers and manufacturers’ web sites.

You can search the database by brand names, ingredients, and manufacturers.

  08/02/11 at 01:33pm via usagov

Met a guy who runs his own business making recycled cardboard computers. He wants to help schools in the rural south, and eventually expand to help governments in developing nations. RecomputePC

  07/19/11 at 11:17am via recomputepc.com