Minnesota Public Radio - so underrated…
Posts tagged podcast.
The Anthropocene is about designing the future.Great lecture by climate scientist Peter Kareiva, discussing communicating climate change at UCLA’s “Environmental Communications in the Anthropocene.” Via nature-brains
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has successfully prevented government scientists from speaking to the public about the environment and climate change ›
Click here to listen to the podcast.
Canada’s conservative government, which has been pressing the Obama Administration to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, has come under sharp criticism for allegedly muzzling Canadian government scientists who talk about the pipeline, climate change and other controversial topics.
The Environmental Law Centre at the University of Victoria released a report called “Muzzling Civil Servants: A Threat to Democracy" that documents the ways in which Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s administration has prevented public scientists from speaking freely about their research.
The Law Centre and Democracy Watch, a leading Canadian public accountability group, have requested an official inquiry into whether these practices violate Canada’s Open Government laws.
Short, yet very insightful, talk with researcher Hans Peter Peters on communicating science to and from the public. He discusses the misconceptions scientists have of the public’s ability to understand science.
Hans also discusses the strategies scientists take to communicate their findings.
What can scientists learn from the public? Science Podcast host Sarah Crespi speaks with social scientist Hans Peter Peters of the Ethics in Neurosciences Research Center in Julich, Germany. Peters gave a talk here today at the annual meeting of AAAS (which publishes ScienceNOW) about how scientists in different countries and age groups think about public engagement.
Most interesting (to me) was that there is an emerging awareness among scientists that the public is more open to discussing research from social science (aka the “soft sciences”) vs discussing the hard sciences. Conversely, media and journalists generally cover psychology, education, and economics much differently than they cover climatology, biology, chemistry etc.
It’s Climate Science Communications Week at Climate Adaptation! For the entire week of Feb. 18 - 23, I’ll cover how climate change is discussed by the media, scientists, researchers, academics, and politicians. If you have sources or ideas on communicating climate change, send to: http://climateadaptation.tumblr.com/submit
Minnesota Public Radio Airing Weekly ‘Climate Cast’ Program | The Yale Forum on Climate Change & The Media ›
Meteorologist Paul Huttner sits down weekly with MPR ‘Daily Circuit’ host to explore new climate science findings and warming impacts statewide and beyond.
A Minnesota Public Radio meteorologist is venturing where many of his peers in commercial broadcasting have feared to tred: MPR’s Paul Huttner, with top management sharing his concerns that the media are under-informing their audiences on climate change, has begun a weekly “Climate Cast” program.
Now listening. Seems promising! How to add to itunes?
Intro to how and why the U.S. Navy and Red Cross are adapting to climate change. About 5 minutes, via the fantastic World Ocean Observatory.
What can the ancients teach us about sustainability? According to Melissa Lane of Princeton University, author of Eco-Republic, quite a lot. She discusses the relevance of Plato to modern environmental problems in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.
If you have an interest in sustainability, climate change, or the ways in which philosophy can be applied to contemporary political problems, I highly recommend taking ten minutes to listen to this interesting interview.
Progressive take on sustainability and redefining the limits of harm.