I want to punch climate change in the face. A blog about the interactions between the built environment, people, and nature. - FAQs - Follow - Face - Ask - Donations - Climate Book Store

Recent Tweets @climatecote

I know, to most of you this is basic stuff. But sometimes it is good to revisit the basics. I like the part about confirmation bias, which I and my fellow enviros fall for all the time…

You know how to tell if something controversial is actually true, but what if you want to read up on something without stumbling into half-truths and pseudoscience? Here’s how to use the internet as a powerful research tool without being led astray.

Your two biggest enemies

  • Your own confirmation bias.Confirmation bias is your own natural tendency to find, believe, and source information that agrees with (or confirms) your already-held opinions about a topic. It’s a problem even for highly educated scientists and experts in their field, and it’s something you’ll need to be ready to battle when you’re looking into a topic that’s new to you. You may be presented with information that’ll challenge your preconceived notions and beliefs. Keep an open mind and seek to understand and find evidence to all sides of an argument (especially the ones you disagree with.) For more on confirmation bias, read this excellent article on the topic
  • Questionable sources of information. The only thing worse than confirmation bias are trapped in unsourced, poorly-cited articles that draw conclusions without backing them up. Even the best do this sometimes, like citing a study that doesn’t support their conclusions or reporting a study’s conclusions blindly. Keep an eye out though, even poorly-cited work can lead you to valuable reading, but unsourced conjecture should be treated as opinion.

Read the rest of the tips at LifeHacker.

It’s Climate Science Communications Week at Climate Adaptation!   For the entire week of Feb. 18 - 23, I’ll cover how climate change is discussed by the media, scientists, researchers, academics, and politicians. If you have sources or ideas on communicating climate change, send to:

  1. sanyfication reblogged this from climateadaptation
  2. theskylarkin reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  3. verhkrys reblogged this from thunder-rides-a-red-horse
  4. cksaul reblogged this from notperfectstillgood
  5. devonbeth reblogged this from floaty-crowny-things
  6. tecinposts reblogged this from sciencenote
  7. iwillgetbacktoyouok reblogged this from sciencenote
  8. biologyformyclass reblogged this from jadedandalittlefae
  9. invisibleconfety reblogged this from bythegods
  10. 2006seashells reblogged this from bythegods
  11. theginganinjaisaspy reblogged this from bythegods
  12. geofaultline reblogged this from climateadaptation
  13. cthulhujizz reblogged this from bythegods
  14. calamuscrest reblogged this from sassiavelli
  15. littlepips reblogged this from bythegods
  16. thefangirlsfangirl reblogged this from audscratprophetlilith
  17. audscratprophetlilith reblogged this from quietcoimetromaniac
  18. cjtheoracle reblogged this from myhairisfabulous
  19. myhairisfabulous reblogged this from watchoutfordinosaurs
  20. watchoutfordinosaurs reblogged this from bythegods
  21. waffletron reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  22. paranoiainbloom reblogged this from bythegods
  23. schnozbrah reblogged this from bythegods
  24. rideronapalehorse reblogged this from bythegods