Climate Adaptation


I want to punch climate change in the face. A blog about the interactions between the built environment, people, and nature. - FAQs - Follow - Face - Ask - Donations - Climate Book Store

How to Conduct Scientific Research On the Internet (Without Getting Duped)

I know, to most of you this is basic stuff. But sometimes it is good to revisit the basics. I like the part about confirmation bias, which I and my fellow enviros fall for all the time…

You know how to tell if something controversial is actually true, but what if you want to read up on something without stumbling into half-truths and pseudoscience? Here’s how to use the internet as a powerful research tool without being led astray.

Your two biggest enemies

  • Your own confirmation bias.Confirmation bias is your own natural tendency to find, believe, and source information that agrees with (or confirms) your already-held opinions about a topic. It’s a problem even for highly educated scientists and experts in their field, and it’s something you’ll need to be ready to battle when you’re looking into a topic that’s new to you. You may be presented with information that’ll challenge your preconceived notions and beliefs. Keep an open mind and seek to understand and find evidence to all sides of an argument (especially the ones you disagree with.) For more on confirmation bias, read this excellent article on the topic
  • Questionable sources of information. The only thing worse than confirmation bias are trapped in unsourced, poorly-cited articles that draw conclusions without backing them up. Even the best do this sometimes, like citing a study that doesn’t support their conclusions or reporting a study’s conclusions blindly. Keep an eye out though, even poorly-cited work can lead you to valuable reading, but unsourced conjecture should be treated as opinion.

Read the rest of the tips at LifeHacker.

It’s Climate Science Communications Week at Climate Adaptation!   For the entire week of Feb. 18 - 23, I’ll cover how climate change is discussed by the media, scientists, researchers, academics, and politicians. If you have sources or ideas on communicating climate change, send to:

  • 726 notes
  • 1 year ago
  • Feb 21, 2013
    1. verhkrys reblogged this from supersorrel007
    2. cksaul reblogged this from notperfectstillgood
    3. devonbeth reblogged this from floaty-crowny-things
    4. tecinposts reblogged this from sciencenote
    5. iwillgetbacktoyouok reblogged this from sciencenote
    6. biologyformyclass reblogged this from jadedandalittlefae
    7. finksvoiceofreason reblogged this from bythegods
    8. 2006seashells reblogged this from bythegods
    9. theginganinjaisaspy reblogged this from bythegods
    10. geofaultline reblogged this from climateadaptation
    11. cthulhujizz reblogged this from bythegods
    12. calamuscrest reblogged this from sassiavelli
    13. littlepips reblogged this from bythegods
    14. thefangirlsfangirl reblogged this from audscratprophetlilith
    15. audscratprophetlilith reblogged this from salvadorantwilek
    16. cjtheoracle reblogged this from hellomynameislore
    17. hellomynameislore reblogged this from watchoutfordinosaurs
    18. watchoutfordinosaurs reblogged this from bythegods
    19. waffletron reblogged this from thescienceofreality
    20. paranoiainbloom reblogged this from bythegods
    21. schnozbrah reblogged this from bythegods
    22. rideronapalehorse reblogged this from bythegods