CLIMATE ADAPTATION

I want to punch climate change in the face. A blog about the interactions between the built environment, people, and nature.


about.me - FAQs - Follow - Face - Ask - Donations - Climate Book Store

Recent Tweets @climatecote

Donald Brown, scholar of climate ethics, blames the press for not challenging politicians to explain their stance on climate change. He’s formulated 10 questions that journalists and the public should ask (which, imo, should be edited down for brevity…).

1. What specific scientific references and sources do you rely upon to conclude that there is a reasonable scientific dispute about whether human actions are causing dangerous climate change?

2. Are you aware that the United States Academy of Sciences and almost all respected scientific organizations whose membership includes scientists  with expertise relevant to climate change science support the scientific consensus view that holds has that the planet is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh impacts from warming are very likely under business-as-usual?

3.  On what basis do you disregard the conclusions that humans are causing dangerous climate change held by the United States Academy of Sciences, over a hundred scientific organizations whose membership includes experts with expertise relevant to the science of climate change, and 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer-reviewed research on climate change?

4. When you claim that the United States need not adopt climate change policies because adverse climate change impacts have not yet been proven, are you claiming that climate change skeptics have proven that human-induced climate change will not create adverse impacts on human health and the ecological systems of others on which their life often depends and if so what is that proof?

5. When you claim that the United States should not adopt climate change policies because there is scientific uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts, are you arguing that no action of climate change should be taken until all scientific uncertainties are resolved given that waiting to resolve all scientific uncertainties before action is taken will very likely make it too late to prevent dangerous human-induced climate change harms according to the consensus view?

Read the rest at, Ethics and Climate.

It’s Climate Science Communications Week at Climate Adaptation!   For the entire week of Feb. 18 - 23, I’ll cover how climate change is discussed by the media, scientists, researchers, academics, and politicians. If you have sources or ideas on communicating climate change, send to: http://climateadaptation.tumblr.com/submit

  1. that-katie-with-the-bangs reblogged this from climateadaptation
  2. terramarique reblogged this from climateadaptation
  3. mayoralbabe reblogged this from climateadaptation
  4. khexter reblogged this from teacherlp
  5. lwbarks reblogged this from silas216
  6. silas216 reblogged this from climateadaptation
  7. jpapimphot reblogged this from climateadaptation
  8. dothecranberrry reblogged this from becauseithinktoomuch
  9. commiefemme reblogged this from becauseithinktoomuch
  10. becauseithinktoomuch reblogged this from climateadaptation
  11. teacherlp reblogged this from climateadaptation
  12. alisonborealis reblogged this from climateadaptation
  13. fkef reblogged this from climateadaptation
  14. windowhirl reblogged this from climateadaptation
  15. progressivebrittania reblogged this from climateadaptation
  16. projectbreathe reblogged this from climateadaptation
  17. myhzjr reblogged this from climateadaptation
  18. el-aleph-deslumbrante reblogged this from climateadaptation
  19. oldparasitesingle reblogged this from climateadaptation
  20. thisshouldbeallisons reblogged this from climateadaptation
  21. powerdoeswhatitwants reblogged this from climateadaptation
  22. thedailygreens reblogged this from climateadaptation