I want to punch climate change in the face. A blog about the interactions between the built environment, people, and nature. - FAQs - Follow - Face - Ask - Donations - Climate Book Store

Recent Tweets @climatecote

Death rate per watts, Nuclear, Oil, Coal. Classic chart exposes cognitive dissonance, and persistent self-denial…

Do you have an opinion about nuclear power? About the relative safety of one form of power over another? How did you come to this opinion?

Here are the stats. For every person killed by nuclear power generation, 4,000 die due to coal, adjusted for the same amount of power produced.

Vivid is not the same as true. It’s far easier to amplify sudden and horrible outcomes than it is to talk about the slow, grinding reality of day to day strife. That’s just human nature. Not included in this chart are deaths due to global political instability involving oil fields, deaths from coastal flooding and deaths due to environmental impacts yet unmeasured, all of which skew it even more if you think about it.

This chart unsettles a lot of people, because there must be something wrong with it. Further proof of how easy it is to fear the unknown and accept what we’ve got.

Via Seth Godin

Update: Nuclear waste is not an issue.

Update II: The reblog comments are incredible. Not one acknowledged or seems to have read the post. Nor, it seems, has a single reader clicked through to read the original post. Only one commenter, that I could tell, attempted to discuss the underlying facts. Instead, there were mostly “But” type replies that repeat the very myths this chart aims to debunk. What an incredible experience from my point of view, and a major lesson learned…

  1. lunegumption reblogged this from starsaremymuse
  2. colonial-abroad reblogged this from smokeandsong
  3. hylacrucifer reblogged this from smokeandsong and added:
    #*coughs meaningfully* #not to mention that there are reactors these days that literally burn nuclear waste as fuel
  4. brandochunderdarkseas reblogged this from smokeandsong
  5. smokeandsong reblogged this from thisisaslongas
  6. thisisaslongas reblogged this from climateadaptation and added:
    Further, there are now passively safe designs for nuclear reactors. It should be remembered that Fukushima was nearly...
  7. grimgroaningghost reblogged this from generalsleepy
  8. vaidomardais reblogged this from generalsleepy
  9. the-abandoned-13 reblogged this from sexymachine
  10. imamathlover reblogged this from climateadaptation
  11. poppunkreject reblogged this from climateadaptation
  12. twiggysbox reblogged this from hiddles-kun
  13. kuhli reblogged this from climateadaptation
  14. opal-inu reblogged this from climateadaptation
  15. emilymariestoddard reblogged this from climateadaptation
  16. snappyfeathers reblogged this from scinerds
  17. canasiamerican reblogged this from climateadaptation
  18. aintnoshakespeare reblogged this from climateadaptation
  19. information-nexus reblogged this from climateadaptation
  20. antikien reblogged this from eidesis and added:
    mind blowing data presented in a clever way!
  21. eidesis reblogged this from passingfad
  22. spiderman9 reblogged this from nickthevag
  23. youngfreeradical reblogged this from climateadaptation
  24. nickthevag reblogged this from climateadaptation