Anyone notice Scalia repeatedly refers to the "Ginsburg dissent”? She did not dissent. ›
-
thepete reblogged this from climateadaptation and added:
I did not notice that! Of course, I didn’t read it either. >_< Can’t they just do an audiobook version of the PDF read...
-
jhiguchi81 likes this
-
sariemcstrickland reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
soiledphotos likes this
-
chloesanchez said:
She dissented in part. She found the minimum coverage provision could be upheld under the Commerce Clause (Roberts says it has to be considered a tax), and found the Medicaid funding rules covered by the Spending Clause (R. struck it down). Is that it?
-
marmynavy likes this
-
nostandingcoffins likes this
-
petrifiedpterodactyl likes this
-
firefliesofimagination likes this
-
agtk said:
Salon did an article on this. salon.com/2012/06…
-
thenoobyorker likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
climateadaptation posted this
