BP accused of attack on academic freedoms after scientists subpoenaed ›

“A pair of scientists have accused BP of an attack on academic freedom after the oil company successfully subpoenaed thousands of confidential emails related to research on the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster.

The accusation from oceanographers Richard Camilli and Christopher Reddy offered a rare glimpse into the behind-the-scenes legal manoeuvring by BP in the billion-dollar legal proceedings arising from the April 2010 blow-out of its well.

It also heightened fears among scientists of an assault on academic freedoms, following the legal campaign against a number of prominent climate scientists.

In an opinion piece in the Boston Globe, the scientists, from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, said they volunteered in the early days of the spill to deploy robotic technology to help BP and the Coast Guard assess how much oil was gushing from the well.

The two researchers turned over some 50,000 pages of research notes and data to BP. But BP demanded more, and obtained a court subpoena for the handover of more than 3,000 confidential emails. The scientists handed over the emails last week – but with severe misgivings, they wrote.

“Our concern is not simply invasion of privacy, but the erosion of the scientific deliberative process,” they wrote. They feared the email exchanges, in which the scientists discuss hitting dead ends or challenging each other on their conclusions, were open to deliberate misinterpretation.

“Incomplete thoughts and half-finished documents attached to emails can be taken out of context and impugned by people who have a motive for discrediting the findings. In addition to obscuring true scientific findings, this situation casts a chill over the scientific process. In future crises, scientists may censor or avoid deliberations, and more importantly, be reluctant to volunteer valuable expertise and technology that emergency responders don’t possess.”

The struggle over the emails indicates the looming legal significance of any data related to the flow of oil from the stricken well.”

The Guardian

  06/05/12 at 12:50pm
  1. misterramsay reblogged this from jayaprada
  2. leftistshuffle reblogged this from silas216
  3. ossa-coxae reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  4. dat-activist reblogged this from anticapitalist
  5. naturallymathematic reblogged this from snarkyanarchy
  6. silas216 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  7. mydaywithd reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  8. dialectics8 reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  9. whenimreallyathundacat reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  10. dibin reblogged this from anticapitalist
  11. h4x0r3d reblogged this from thisisnotjay
  12. thisisnotjay reblogged this from anticapitalist
  13. finitecircuit reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  14. teaandcrumpets reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  15. i---i reblogged this from inspirement
  16. ebanis reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  17. zemoufette reblogged this from anticapitalist
  18. newsandtrade reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  19. phroyd reblogged this from questionall
  20. freeopensociety reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  21. aestheticobsession reblogged this from polymathlete
  22. polymathlete reblogged this from anarcho-queer
  23. spikeghost reblogged this from pewpewlasernipples
  24. robcayman reblogged this from inspirement
  25. occupy-my-blog reblogged this from thepeoplesrecord
  26. dat-asterisk reblogged this from anticapitalist
  27. pulsarae reblogged this from anarcho-queer