Since last year’s disaster in Fukushima, Japan has shut down all 54 of its nuclear power plants. But how long can Japan remain nuke-free? ›
“Perhaps not for long. Already, a slew of reports are warning that Japan could face grim economic consequences if it keeps its reactors offline. Before a tsunami and earthquake caused a meltdown at Fukushima’s Daiichi reactor last year, atomic power provided 27 percent of the Japan’s electricity. Since the shutdowns, the country has been importing more oil and natural gas to keep the lights on. And that’s costly. A recent report (pdf) from Japan’s Institute for Energy Economics found that, as a result, the country’s GDP would grow just 0.1 percent in 2012, and Japan could find struggling with electricity shortages during the sweaty summer months.
By contrast, the IEEJ report found, if Japan began switching its nuclear reactors back on this summer, the economy would grow 1.9 percent this year — largely because lower electricity prices would allow factories to ramp up production. What’s more, by curtailing its fossil-fuel imports, Japan would be able to run a trade surplus this year, instead of a projected $57 billion trade deficit. (Currently, Japan imports about 90 percent of its oil from the Middle East, and the country’s newfound appetite for crude has helped drive global prices upward.)
What Japan does with its reactors could have significant climate-change consequences, too”
Via the excellent Brad Plumer of WaPo
-
niccosays reblogged this from studio630
-
studio630 reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
danielwinks answered:
Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro can’t (at this time) provide enough. Anti-nuke is effectively “pro-coal”, and that’s just dumb.
-
animalsandtrees likes this
-
miyakdunets likes this
-
on-thee-fence reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
wanderingsummers reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
nerdigbynature likes this
-
gregorychatman likes this
-
madriag reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
the-green-change reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
bonedust likes this
-
realitista answered:
This was a very stupid move from Japan. They should spend that $57 billion making what they have safer.
-
rocksandants likes this
-
thelighthousegirl likes this
-
swirlingsurreality reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
soheidre likes this
-
climbinglyell likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from climateadaptation
-
equalitywatch likes this
-
climateadaptation posted this

